Move over Tinder.
Looks like there’s another dating site that’s gaining popularity and it’s called Seeking Arrangement.
Alright. Fine. So there’s a catch.
You’d have to be OK with dating, and potentially sleeping with, someone who is old enough to be your grandfather because it’s a site facilitates sugar daddy-sugar baby arrangements.
But, it seems that participating in sugar daddy-sugar baby relationships is becoming an increasingly popular way for young, financially strapped and debt-burdened college-aged women, and even men, to seek out creative solutions to their money woes.
As it turns out, now that digital dating has become mainstream, there’s a handful of websites that you can choose from that connect older, wealthy men and young women looking for financial support. According to the SeekingArrangement.com, the dating site that boasts over 3 million members worldwide, 40 percent of the website’s total population was comprised of college students in 2011. After a 58 percent increase in co-ed signups in 2012, the total population amount then grew to 44 percent. Oh, and get this. According to the site, the average monthly “allowance” that sugar daddies shell out to their “babies” is $3,000.
So which cities offer the most promising potential for a sugar daddy- sugar baby arrangement?
According to the rankings released by the Seeking Arrangement site here are the top 10 gold-digging cities:
10. San Francisco: 14.21 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
9. Chicago: 14.53 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
8. Tampa: 14.59 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
7. Vancouver: 15.36 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
6. Dallas: 16.83 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
5. Orlando: 18.1 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
4. Boston: 18.25 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
3. Las Vegas: 19.23 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
2. Atlanta: 21.60 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
1. Austin: 23.24 sugar daddies per 1,000 men
[H/T: Bro Bible]
Can’t get enough of Campus Sports? Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to stay updated with the latest news and exclusive giveaways!
*Featured Photo (above) credit to USA TODAY Sports
